Challenges of Cultural Heritage Tourism Sites in Albania and the Right of Tourists to Information: The Case of the City of Elbasan

First published: 24 June 2026 | https://doi.org/10.63871/unvl.jsuv2.1.33
Humanities & Social Sciences Section

Authors

Ansi Kotollaku

University “Aleksandër Xhuvani”, Elbasan, Albania | ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4944-5096


Mimoza Kotollaku

University “Aleksandër Xhuvani”, Elbasan, Albania | ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8176-4059


Lenida Lekli

University “Aleksandër Xhuvani”, Elbasan, Albania | ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0958-9723


Abstract

Cultural heritage constitutes one of the most important assets for the sustainable development of tourism in Albania. Cultural heritage implies a common bond, our belonging to a community. It represents our connection with the past, present and future. In the digital age, official tourism websites and cultural portals constitute the main source of information for domestic and foreign visitors. However, a considerable number of these websites present significant shortcomings in the English language version, which directly affects the right of tourists to be informed accurately and the perception of institutional professionalism.

This study aims to analyze the quality of translations and content on websites that promote cultural heritage in Albania, with a special focus on the city of Elbasan. The analysis includes linguistic, legal and institutional aspects that affect access to information and transparency towards the international public.  The findings show that the lack of standardization, professional translations and institutional coordination limits the promotional potential and undermines the implementation of the Law on the Right to Information. The study proposes concrete interventions to improve multilingual communication and strengthen transparency in the cultural heritage tourism sector. 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

Hogberg, A. (2016). Rodney Harrison: Heritage: Critical Approaches. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 49(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.2015.1126632

Loulanski, T. (2006). Cultural heritage in socioeconomic development: Local and global perspectives. Environments, 34(2), 54–55.

Hall, C. M., & McArthur, S. (Eds.). (1996). Heritage management in Australia and New Zealand: The human dimension. Oxford University Press.

United Nations World Tourism Organization. (2011). Communicating heritage: A handbook for the tourism sector. UNWTO.

Albert, B. (2010). Reality and technology. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 27–35.

Jin, P., & Liu, Y. (2022). Fluid space: Digitisation of cultural heritage and its media dissemination. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 8, Article 100022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2022.100022

United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2022). Tourism and hospitality in Albania 2022: An assessment of tourism trends and performance. UNDP Albania

Chen, S., & Zhou, T. (2024). Culturally based semantic losses in Lonely Planet’s travel guides translations for Beijing, Shanghai, and Sichuan. Frontiers in Communication, 9, 1343784. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1343784

Bu, F., Wang, Z., Wang, S., & Liu, Z. (2025). An investigation into value misalignment in LLM-generated texts for cultural heritage. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/TETCI.2025.3597289

Municipality of Elbasan. (2022). Analyses and strategy for marketing, promotion & branding of unique Krushevo & Elbasan tourism package. Municipality of Elbasan.

Hasani, M. (Hoshafi), & Xhoga Çupi, D. (2024). Use of Albanian language in information boards for cultural and natural heritage sites: Causes and effects. International Scientific Journal Monte, 9(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.33807/monte.20243135

Council of Europe. (2020). Recommendation CM/Rec(2020)1 on the promotion of multilingualism in the digital environment. Council of Europe.

Council of Europe. (2020). Access to cultural heritage and information policies in Europe. Council of Europe.

UNESCO. (2019). Guidelines for multilingual communication in cultural heritage websites. UNESCO.

United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO). (2021). Tourism and accessibility: Ensuring inclusive and transparent information. UNWTO.

Venuti, L. (2012). The translator's invisibility: A history of translation (2nd ed.). Routledge.

European Commission. (2020). Digital strategy for cultural heritage communication in the European Union. European Commission.

Ministry of Culture of Albania. (2023). National strategy for cultural heritage and tourism 2024-2030. Ministry of Culture of Albania.

Republic of Albania. (2014). Law No. 119/2014 on the right to information (as amended). Official Publication Centre

Council of Europe. (2024). European Convention on Human Rights. European Court of Human Rights

Citing Literature

How to cite this article:

Kotollaku, A. et al. DOI: 10.63871/unvl.jsuv2.1.33; UniVlora Scientific Journal 2026, no.II, volume I