Exploring the Latent Dimensions of STEM Orientation among Albanian Upper-Secondary Students

First published: 01 April 2026 | https://doi.org/10.63871/unvl.jsuv1.2.21
Technical Science Section
Original Research Article

Authors

Orgeta Gjermëni

Department of Mathematics and Physics, Faculty of Technical and Natural Sciences, University “Ismail Qemali” Vlore, Albania | ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6615-8634


Miftar Ramosaçaj

Technical Science Section Editor-in-chief | ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7852-0319


Elmira Kushta

Department of Mathematics and Physics, Faculty of Technical and Natural Sciences, University “Ismail Qemali” Vlore, Albania | ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6200-4635


Astrit Denaj

Department of Mathematics and Physics, Faculty of Technical and Natural Sciences, University “Ismail Qemali” Vlore, Albania | ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7594-5058


Abstract

This study investigated the latent dimensions underlying upper-secondary students’ orienta-tion toward STEM fields in the Fier-Vlora region of Albania. It aimed to identify the factorial struc-ture underlying perceptions of cognitive, contex-tual, and sociocultural influences; assess the instrument's psychometric properties; and con-firm its structural validity through confirmatory factor analysis. A quantitative, cross-sectional design was ap-plied using a structured SCCT-informed question-naire administered to grade 11-12 students. Data suitability was verified via KMO and Bartlett’s tests. Exploratory factor analysis (MINRES ex-traction, oblimin rotation) was conducted to identify the latent structure. Confirmatory factor analysis (WLSMV estimator) was then applied to assess factorial stability, with model fit evaluated using classical/robust CFI, TLI, RMSEA and SRMR indices. Reliability (Cronbach’s α, KR-20), convergent validity (CR, AVE), and discriminant validity (Fornell–Larcker criterion) were examined.

The study validated a coherent five-factor structure that captures: cognitive engagement with STEM; outcome expectations and career utility; behavioral exposure to STEM activities; social and family support; instructional and career guidance. The instrument demonstrates strong psychometric properties and provides a contex-tually grounded tool for assessing STEM-related orientations among Albanian upper-secondary students.

Keywords: STEM orientation; upper-secondary education; factor analysis; Social Cognitive Career Theory; psychometric validation; Albanian students


Background

The acronym STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) has become a global focal point for economic growth and labor market readiness. In Albania, the education system faces challenges due to declining birth rates and high emigration, leading to a projected 10.74% decrease in the population under 25. While the National Strategy for Education (2021–2026) prioritizes STEM integration, statistics from 2015-2024 show a sustained decline in students choosing "Natural sciences, mathematics, and statistics," even as interest in "Engineering and ICT" remains stable or grows. Despite these trends, there was a lack of contextually grounded research in Albania regarding the factors that drive student orientation toward STEM. This study addresses that gap by using Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) to explore how cognitive, contextual, and sociocultural factors influence Albanian upper-secondary students' academic and career pathways.


Methods

This study employed a quantitative, cross-sectional, psychometric research design using an exploratory-confirmatory sequence. A structured questionnaire was administered to 499 students in grades 11 and 12 from 14 schools across the Fier-Vlora region. The instrument was informed by SCCT and initially contained 20 items (excluding demographics) measured primarily on a 5-point Likert scale. Data analysis was conducted using R software. First, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) using MINRES extraction and oblimin rotation was used to identify the latent structure, resulting in a reduced set of 16 items for better parsimony. Second, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using the WLSMV estimator was applied to validate the model's structural stability. Psychometric properties were assessed via KMO/Bartlett’s tests for factorability, Cronbach’s alpha and KR-20 for reliability, and the Fornell-Larcker criterion for discriminant validity.


Results

The analysis validated a robust five-factor structure for STEM orientation. The EFA refined the initial 20-item set to 16 items, significantly improving the model's clarity. The final CFA model demonstrated satisfactory fit indices: Robust CFI = 0.945, Robust TLI = 0.929, Robust RMSEA = 0.079, and SRMR = 0.037. Reliability values for the five factors ranged from 0.617 to 0.885. The five latent dimensions identified were:

1. Cognitive engagement (self-efficacy/motivation);
2. Outcome expectations (career utility and social mobility);
3. Behavioral exposure (participation in extracurricular STEM activities);
4. Social and family support (influence of role models and parents);
5. Instructional and career guidance (teacher encouragement and institutional support).

The data also highlighted gender and demographic distributions, with 53.91% female participants and 76.95% of the sample residing in urban areas.


Conclusions

The study successfully established a five-factor model that captures the multidimensional nature of STEM orientation among Albanian students. The findings align with Social Cognitive Career Theory, suggesting that interest in STEM is not purely cognitive but deeply influenced by social modeling, parental support, and institutional guidance. Specifically, the "Instructional Guidance" factor underscores the importance of hands-on, teacher-led experimentation in fostering student engagement. The authors conclude that the validated 16-item instrument is a reliable, contextually adapted tool for Albanian educators and policymakers. It provides a foundation for future longitudinal research to explore how these latent dimensions interact with demographic variables to shape career trajectories, ultimately helping the education system better align with the needs of the modern labor market.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Blackley S, Howell J. A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Aust J Teach Educ. 2015;40(7). doi:10.14221/ajte.2015v40n7.8
2. Reeve EM. The need for STEM education: Now more than ever! SE Asian J STEM Educ. 2021;2(1):94–110. Available from: https://seameo-stemed.org/wp-content/up-loads/2023/12/Vol.2_No.1.pdf
3. Këshilli i Ministrave. Vendim nr. 621, datë 22.10.2021, për miratimin e Strategjisë Kombëtare për Arsimin 2021–2026 dhe të Planit të Veprimit. Tiranë: Qendra e Botimeve Zyrtare; 2021. Available from: https://www.qbz.gov.al/share/Gh_2jgX8SaCs-CeoQlYeOw
4. INSTAT. Studentë të regjistruar në arsimin e lartë sipas fushave të studimit [Internet]. Ti-ranë: Instituti i Statistikave; [cited 2025 Jul 16].Available from: https://www.in-stat.gov.al/al/temat/tregu-i-pun%C3%ABs-dhe-arsimi/arsimi/#tab2
5. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. ISCED fields of education and training 2013 (ISCED-F 2013): manual to accompany the International Standard Classification of Education 2011. Montreal (CA): UNESCO; 2014. doi:10.15220/978-92-9189-150-4-en
6. Këshilli i Ministrave. Vendim nr. 542 për mirat-imin e Strategjisë Kombëtare për Kërkimin Shkencor, Teknologjinë dhe Inovacionin 2023–2030 dhe të Planit të Veprimit. Tiranë: Qendra e Botimeve Zyrtare; 2023. Available from: https://www.qbz.gov.al/share/Czi-CAqPkQiWqQq4TCnGR-g
7. Ministria e Arsimit dhe Sportit. Korniza Kurrikulare e Arsimit Parauniversitar të Re-publikës së Shqipërisë. Tiranë: MAS; 2014. Available from: https://ascap.edu.al/wp-con-tent/uploads/2017/03/Korniza-Kurriku-lare.pdf
8. Lent RW, Brown SD, Hackett G. Toward a uni-fying social cognitive theory of career and ac-ademic interest, choice, and performance. J Vocat Behav. 1994;45:79–122.
9. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1986.
10. Ministria e Arsimit dhe Sportit. Urdhër nr. 463 për përcaktimin e kritereve për miratimin e “Mësuesit koordinator për sigurimin e cilësisë” dhe të “Mësuesit koordinator të këshillimit të karrierës” në institucionet arsimore të arsimit parauniversitar. Tiranë: MAS; 2024. Available from:https://zvapkurbin.edu.al/wp-con-tent/uploads/2024/09/Urdher-nr.463-date-30.08.2024-Mesues-koordinator-per-sig.ci-lesie-dhe-keshillimi-karriere.pdf
11. Sellami AL, Al-Rakeb NA, Tok E. Secondary school students’ interest in STEM careers in
Qatar. Educ Sci. 2023;13(4):369. doi:10.3390/educsci13040369
12. ElSayary A. The influence of UAE schools initi-atives on high-school students’ STEM career aspirations. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ.2023;19(2):em2225. doi:10.29333/ejmste/12913
13. Ribeirinha T, Baptista M, Correia M. The im-pact of STEM activities on the interest and as-pirations in STEM careers of 12th-grade Por-tuguese students. Eur J STEM Educ. 2024;9(1):21. doi:10.20897/ejsteme/15830
14. Tomperi P, Kvivesen M, Manshadi S, Uteng S, Shestova Y, Lyash O, et al. Investigation of STEM subject and career aspirations of lower secondary school students in the North Calotte Region. Educ Sci. 2022;12:192. doi:10.3390/educsci12030192
15. Zhang Q, Chia HM, Chen K. Examining stu-dents’ perceptions of STEM subjects and ca-reer interests. J Technol Educ. 2022;33(2):4–19. doi:10.21061/jte.v33i2.a.1
16. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Mul-tivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson; 2009.
17. Kier MW, Blanchard MR, Osborne JW, Albert JL. The development of the STEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS). Res Sci Educ. 2014;44:461–81. doi:10.1007/s11165-013-9389-3
18. Sellami A, Santhosh ME, Siby N, Bhadra J, Ah-mad Z. High school students’ perceptions of so-cial support in STEM. Sustainability. 2023;15(17):12960. doi:10.3390/su151712960
19. Sellami AL, Al-Ali A, Allouh A, Alhazbi S. Stu-dent attitudes and interests in STEM in Qatar. Sustainability. 2023;15:7504. doi:10.3390/su15097504
20. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2023. Available from: https://www.R-project.org
21. Anderson TW, Darling DA. Asymptotic theory of certain "goodness of fit" criteria based on stochastic processes. Ann Math Stat. 1952;23(2):193–212. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:120541257
22. Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psy-chometrika. 1974;39(1):31–6. doi:10.1007/BF02291575
23. Kaiser HF. A second generation Little Jiffy*. Psychometrika. 1970;35(4):401–15.
24. Bartlett MS. Tests of significance in factor analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1950;3:77–85. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x
25. Revelle W. psych: Procedures for psychologi-cal, psychometric, and personality research [Internet]. Evanston (IL): Northwestern Uni-versity; 2024. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych
26. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 6th ed. Boston (MA): Pearson; 2014.
27. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of as-sessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res. 1992;21:230–58. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
28. Hu L, Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underpa-rameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods. 1998;3(4):424–53.
29. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.
30. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT. Exploratory factor analysis [online ed.]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. doi:10.1093/ac-prof:osobl/9780199734177.001.000
31. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2011.
32. Reise SP, Widaman KF. Assessing the fit of measurement models at the individual level. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(1):3–21. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.3
33. Raftery AE. Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociol Methodol. 1995;25:111–63. doi:10.2307/271063
34. Reise SP, Moore TM, Haviland MG. Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to
which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. J Pers Assess. 2010;92(6):544–59. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.496477
35. Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
36. Satorra A, Bentler PM. A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika. 2001;66(4):507–14. doi:10.1007/BF02296192
37. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3151312
38. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
39. DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications. Vol. 26. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2012.
40. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the inter-nal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3):297–334.
41. Razali F, Manaf UKA, Ayub AFM. STEM educa-tion in Malaysia towards developing a human capital through motivating science subject. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res. 2020;19(5):411–22. doi:10.26803/ijlter.19.5.25
42. Chen Y, So WWM, Zhu J, Chiu SWK. STEM learning opportunities and career aspira-tions: the interactive effect of students’ self-concept and perceptions of STEM profession-als. Int J STEM Educ. 2024;11(1). doi:10.1186/s40594-024-00466-7
43. Ulum H, Küçükaydın MA. Understanding Turk-ish students’ STEM career aspirations and cul-tural capital: A path analysis. STEM Educ. 2024;4(4):364–80. doi:10.3934/steme.2024021
44. Mitsopoulou AG, Pavlatou EA. Factors associ-ated with the development of secondary school students’ interest towards STEM stud-ies. Educ Sci. 2021;11:746. doi:10.3390/educsci11110746

Citing Literature

How to cite this article:

Gjerme ni, O. , at al. DOI: 10.63871…. UniVlora Scientific Journal 2025, no.I, volume II